|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > drbd-user archives|
Yes you were right, my virtual machines for development was misconfigured with only 384M of RAM.
Sorry for wrong report,
-- matteo ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Lars Ellenberg" <email@example.com> A: firstname.lastname@example.org Inviato: sabato 6 marzo 2010 17.40.56 (GMT+0100) Europe/Berlin Oggetto: Re: [DRBD-user] 2.6.33 panic on resync On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:12:33PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 04:42:20PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: > > On 03/06/2010 03:31 PM, Matteo Tescione wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I succesfully compiled drbd-8.3.7 against linux-2.6.33 with builtin drbd module running centos5.3 x86_64. > > > > What do you mean you compiled 8.3.7 "against" 2.6.33? Did you do an > > out-of-tree module build from current git? If so, why? Or did you just > > roll your kernel with DRBD enabled? > > > > > However i'm experiencing kernel panic few seconds after a full resync starts. > > > Attached is a screnshot of the panic. > > > > Even though the picture isn't exactly of prime quality, > > Pictures of text should be png, if possible. > > > the message is > > plain English: "out of memory and no killable processes". Fix your > > memory pressure? > > > Let's do an example. > I've got some "embeded router" thingy, with 32 Meg RAM, > which is plenty for what it usually does. > > It sports a USB "storage link", and "hacked up" linux firmware. > So I could, in theory, add DRBD to it, > and hook up a 1 TB external usb drive. > > In practice, as DRBD uses a fixed 4k storage -> 1 bit granularity, > and still holds the full bitmap in memory, > we need (1 ** 40 byte / 1 ** 12 byte ) bits, > which is (1 ** 25 byte): 32 Megs of unswappable in core memory. > > As Homer puts it: D'oh. > > We used to do a sanity check for available memory in kernel, > but the necessary functions have been made unavailable or changed, > so we dropped that again. > > We can easily add a sanity check to drbdsetup, which is > what will do short term, to prevent you from killing > your box that easily. > > We also currently rework our meta data layout and handling, > to make the bitmap granularity as well as the in-core > amount of pages configurable. But that won't happen overnight. > > So: this is not a "real bug". Just a "usage bug". Oh, I just realized: you said it was breaking during resync... Well, probably the bitmap was "just fitting", and the additional buffers allocated for resync traffic killed your box then. See "Summarizing DRBD memory usage" http://marc.info/?l=drbd-user&m=121689625213486 And "memory requirements for DRBD" http://marc.info/?l=drbd-user&m=123273268107703 You should know, you are with us since almost three years, iirc! Thanks for that, btw ;-) PS we also do consulting... -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com DRBDÂ® and LINBITÂ® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria. __ please don't Cc me, but send to list -- I'm subscribed _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list email@example.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user