Re: PTR format question

From: Alan Clegg <aclegg_at_nospam>
Date: Sat Mar 20 2010 - 23:48:10 GMT
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org

groups wrote:
> In the process of cleaning up a much neglected PTR file
>
> Bind: 9.6.2.1
> OS: CentOS 5.4
>
> Current PTR in this format: (1 tab between entries)
>
> $ORIGIN 58.172.in-addr.arpa.
> $ORIGIN 0.58.172.in-addr.arpa.
> 11 PTR nat-172-58-0-11.example.com.
> 12 PTR nat-172-58-0-12.example.com.
> ...
> $ORIGIN 58.172.in-addr.arpa.
> $ORIGIN 1.58.172.in-addr.arpa.
> 21 PTR nat-172-58-1-21.example.com.
> 22 PTR nat-172-58-1-22.example.com.
> ...
> $ORIGIN 58.172.in-addr.arpa.
> $ORIGIN 2.58.172.in-addr.arpa.
> 31 PTR nat-172-58-2-31.example.com.
> 32 PTR nat-172-58-2-32.example.com.
> ...

$ORIGIN 0.58.172.in-addr.arpa.
$GENERATE 11-... $ PTR nat-172-58-0-$.example.com.

$ORIGIN 1.58.172.in-addr.arpa.
$GENERATE 21-... $ PTR nat-172-58-1-$.example.com.

Do note that these ranges look suspicious.

AlanC

_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Doug Barton: "Re: PTR format question"
Previous message: michael peters: "BIND9 Internal Reverse Look-ups Fail"
In reply to: groups: "PTR format question"
Next in thread: groups: "Re: PTR format question"
Reply: groups: "Re: PTR format question"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]